SQL injection (SQLi) is a critical application security vulnerability that could allow an attacker the ability to manipulate SQL queries sent to a database. This happens when an attacker is able to insert or “inject” malicious SQL code into a query, which can then be executed by the database.
Typically, SQL injection vulnerabilities arise when user input is not properly validated or sanitised before being included in SQL queries.
Despite being a well-known vulnerability, SQL injection remains a common issue in web applications due to poor coding practices and lack of security awareness among developers, and frequently appears in the OWASP Top 10 list of web application security risks.
By exploiting SQL injection weaknesses, attackers can potentially gain unauthorised access to sensitive data, data modification or deletion, and even complete control over the database server. This can lead to severely impacting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the data stored within the database, as well as the reputation of the organisation that owns the application.
How SQL Injection Works
As a simple example, consider a web application that allows its users to log in by entering their credentials (username and password). The application might construct a SQL query that sends the following command when a user normally logs in:
SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = 'user1' AND password = 'password';
If the application does not properly validate or sanitise the input, an attacker could manipulate the input fields to inject malicious SQL code. For example, if an attacker enters the following into the password field:
' OR '1'='1
The resulting SQL query would look like this:
SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '' AND password = 'password' OR '1' = '1';
In this case, the condition '1' = '1' is always true, which means the query will return all rows from the users table, effectively bypassing the authentication mechanism. This is a simple example, but SQL injection attacks can be much more complex and damaging.
Why this works
When a query is constructed dynamically by concatenating user input directly into the SQL statement, it can introduce a SQLi vulnerability. Take the following example in Python of a vulnerable query construction:
query = f"select * from users where username = {username} and password = {password};"
In this case, if the username or password variables contain malicious SQL code, it will be included in the final query string and executed by the database.
Types of SQL Injection Attacks
There are several common forms of SQLi attacks, which include:
- Error-based SQL Injection: This technique relies on the error messages that are returned by the database server. By intentionally causing errors in the SQL query, an attacker can gain insights into the database structure and potentially extract sensitive information.
- Union-based SQL Injection: This method involves using the
UNIONSQL operator to combine the results of two or moreSELECTstatements. - Blind SQL Injection: In this type of attack, the attacker does not receive direct feedback from the database, like with error-based SQLi. Instead, the application behaves differently based on the results of the injected query, allowing the attacker to infer information about the database.
- Time-based Blind SQL Injection: This is a subtype of blind SQLi where the attacker uses time delays to infer information about the database. By injecting SQL code that causes the database to pause for a certain amount of time, the attacker can determine whether a condition is true or false based on the response time.
- Out-of-Band SQL Injection: This technique involves using different channels to retrieve data from the database, such as sending the results to an external server controlled by the attacker.
Error Based SQL Injection Example
An example of an error-based SQL injection attack could involve an attacker entering the following input into a search field:
' OR 1=1 --
This input could cause the application to generate a SQL query like this:
SELECT *
FROM products
WHERE product_name = '' OR 1=1 --';
The -- sequence is used to comment out the rest of the SQL query, effectively ignoring any additional conditions. The condition 1=1 is always true, which means the query will return all rows from the products table.
Note: Error-based SQL injection can be particularly dangerous because it can provide attackers with detailed information about the database structure, which can be used to launch more sophisticated attacks.
To mitigate this risk, it is important to ensure that error messages are not displayed to users and that input is properly validated and sanitised.
Union Based SQL Injection Example
An example of a union-based SQL injection attack could involve an attacker entering the following input into a search field:
' UNION SELECT username, password FROM users --
This input could cause the application to generate a SQL query like this:
SELECT product_name, product_sku
FROM products
WHERE
product_name = ''
UNION
SELECT username, password
FROM users --';
In this case, the UNION operator is used to combine the results of the original query with the results of a second query that retrieves usernames and passwords from the users table. The -- sequence is again used to comment out any additional conditions.
A UNION-based SQL injection attack can be particularly dangerous because it allows an attacker to retrieve data from other tables in the database, potentially exposing sensitive information. However, it requires the attacker to have some knowledge of the database schema, such as the number of columns in the original query and their data types otherwise the query will fail.
Note: There are methods to identify the number of columns in a query, such as using
ORDER BYclauses or by incrementally adding columns to theUNIONstatement until the query succeeds.
Impact of SQL Injection Attacks
SQL injection vulnerabilities are often the crown jewels of web application security flaws due to the potential impact they can have.
Some of the consequences of a successful SQLi attack can impact the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the database and the application itself, including:
- Data Breach: Attackers can extract sensitive information from the database, such as user credentials, personal data, and financial information.
- Data Manipulation: SQLi can allow attackers to modify or delete data, leading to data loss or corruption.
- Authentication Bypass and privilege escalation: As demonstrated in the example above, SQLi can be used to bypass authentication mechanisms, allowing unauthorised access to user accounts.
- Remote Code Execution: In some cases, SQLi can be exploited to execute arbitrary commands on the database server, potentially leading to full system compromise. This used to be more common with older database systems, where features like
xp_cmdshellin Microsoft SQL Server could be abused. - Denial of Service (DoS): Attackers can use SQLi to perform actions that degrade the performance of the database or application, leading to service disruptions.
- Reputation Damage: A successful SQLi attack can lead to significant reputational damage for an organisation, especially if sensitive customer data is compromised.
Mitigating & Preventing SQL Injection Attacks
Preventing SQL injection attacks should be considered a multi-layered approach that includes secure coding practices, input validation, and input sanitisation.
Input Validation and Sanitisation
The primary defence against SQL injection is to ensure that all user provided input is properly validated and sanitised before being processed and included in SQL queries.
An example of input validation is to check that a provided email address is in a valid format before using it in a query. Input sanitisation involves removing, escaping, or encoding any potentially dangerous characters from user input, such as single quotes (') or semicolons (;), along with several other common SQL special characters.
It may be easier to use a white-list approach, where only known good input is accepted, rather than trying to filter out known bad input. For example, if a field is expected to contain only numeric values, then any non-numeric input should be rejected.
Use of Prepared Statements and Parameterised Queries
One of the most effective ways to prevent SQL injection is to use prepared statements and parameterised queries. Prepared statements and parameterised queries are often used interchangeably, but they have some differences.
These techniques separate the SQL code from the data, ensuring that user input is treated as data rather than executable code.
Prepared statements are a feature of the database management system (DBMS) that allows SQL statements to be pre-compiled and stored for later execution.
Parameterised queries, on the other hand, are a programming technique that involves using placeholders in SQL statements to represent user input values.
For example, in PHP using PDO, a parameterised query might look like this:
$query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = :username AND password = :password';
$stmt = $pdo->prepare($query);
$stmt->bindParam(':username', $username);
$stmt->bindParam(':password', $password);
$stmt->execute();
$results = $stmt->fetchAll();
In this example, the :username and :password placeholders are used to represent user input, which is then bound to actual values using the bindParam method. This ensures that any special characters in the input are properly escaped, preventing SQL injection.
With Python, if you are using a Framework like Flask with SQLAlchemy, you can use parameterised queries as follows:
query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = :username AND password = :password"
params = {'username': username, 'password': password}
result = db.session.execute(query, params)
In this case, SQLAlchemy automatically handles the parameterisation and escaping of user input, making it safe from SQL injection attacks.
Principle of Least Privilege
Whilst not a direct mitigation for SQL injection, it is important to ensure that the database user account used by the application has the minimum privileges necessary to perform its functions. This limits the potential damage that can be caused by a successful SQLi attack.
Setting up different database users for different parts of the application, each with specific permissions, can help contain the impact of a compromise. For example, a read-only user should be used for operations that only require data retrieval, while a separate user with write permissions could be used for data modification tasks.
Regular Security Testing and Code Reviews
Regular security testing, including penetration testing and code reviews, can help identify SQL injection vulnerabilities before they can be exploited by attackers. Regularly reviewing the source code for secure coding practices and adherence to input validation and sanitisation standards can help catch potential issues early in the development process.
Web Application Firewalls (WAFs)
Implementing a Web Application Firewall (WAF) is a modern day necessity for protecting web applications from a variety of threats, including SQL injection attacks. A well configured WAF can help detect and block malicious SQLi attempts before they reach the application backend.
However, it is important to note that a WAF should not be relied upon as the sole defence against SQL injection. It should be used in conjunction with secure coding practices and other mitigation strategies, and can sometimes lead to a false sense of security if not properly managed.
Detecting SQL Injection Vulnerabilities
There are a variety of tools and techniques that can be used to detect SQL injection vulnerabilities in web applications. Some of the most common methods include:
Automated Scanners
There are dozens of automated tools available that can scan applications for SQL injection vulnerabilities. These tools typically work by sending a variety of test inputs to the application and analysing the responses for signs of SQLi vulnerabilities. Examples of popular tools include SQLMap, OWASP ZAP, and Burp Suite.
But, these tools can often be noisy or potentially dangerous to run on production systems without fine-tuning. For example, if you were to run an automated SQLi scan against a live e-commerce website, it could potentially disrupt normal operations or even cause data loss if the tool were to exploit a vulnerability.
Manual Penetration Testing
Experienced security professionals can often uncover SQL injection vulnerabilities through manual testing where the target environment is too critical to use automated tools, or where the application is complex and requires a more nuanced approach.
Manual testing typically involves a combination of techniques, including input manipulation, error message analysis, and logic testing to identify potential SQLi weaknesses.
Take the next step in securing your applications with our expert penetration testing services.Secure Your Applications
Code Reviews
Regular code reviews can help identify SQL injection vulnerabilities by ensuring that secure coding practices are being followed. This includes checking for proper input validation, sanitisation, and the use of prepared statements or parameterised queries.
Where possible, code reviews should be conducted by someone other than the original developer to provide a fresh perspective and catch potential issues that may have been overlooked.
There are also static analysis tools that can help automate parts of the code review process by analysing the source code for common SQLi patterns and vulnerabilities. Many modern IDEs have plugins or built-in features that can assist with this, and there are also integrations that use CI/CD pipelines to automatically scan code for vulnerabilities as part of the development process.
AI Driven Code Analysis
With the rise of AI and machine learning, there are now tools that can analyse code for potential vulnerabilities, including SQL injection. These tools can learn from large datasets of known vulnerabilities and use this knowledge to identify similar patterns in new code.
While AI-driven code analysis can be a powerful tool, it is important to remember that it should not be relied upon as the sole method for identifying SQLi vulnerabilities. It should be used in conjunction with other techniques, such as manual code reviews and static analysis tools, to provide both the breadth and depth approach to security testing.
SQL Injection Checklist
SQL injection is a serious security vulnerability that can have devastating consequences for web applications and their underlying databases. By understanding how SQLi works and implementing best practices for prevention, organisations can significantly reduce the risk of SQL injection attacks.
Key takeaways include:
- Always validate and sanitise user input to prevent malicious data from being processed.
- Use prepared statements and parameterised queries to separate SQL code from data.
- Follow the principle of least privilege when configuring database user accounts.
- Regularly test your applications for SQL injection vulnerabilities through automated scanning, manual penetration testing, and code reviews.
- Consider implementing a Web Application Firewall (WAF) as an additional layer of defence.
By taking these steps, organisations can help protect their applications and data from the potentially devastating effects of SQL injection attacks.
